Hacker News Clone new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit | github repologin
Elon Musk has pledged to settle Mars. Prize-winning book offers a reality check (www.cnn.com)
8 points by pseudolus 2 hours ago | hide | past | web | 5 comments | favorite





Space hype is nothing new. Werner von Braun was doing it. It is very likely that astronauts could go to Mars, walk around, maybe even stay in some kind of shelter for weeks to months, and we'll benefit in the form of some technology and engineering spinoffs. But it will be as if Earth's colonizers landed on a barren rock and tried to build a "colony" there. Without people and resources, it isn't a colony. That's not how colonies work. It wouldn't make humaniity multiplanetary. It would just create the longest, most expensive, Earth-based supply chain evar. If Earth suffered a civilizational collapse, the Martians would be dead a few months later.

I was hoping to read something about "Martian Time-slip".

I've always responded to Mars ambitions with, first try a colony on the top of Mt Everest. There's more water there, more oxygen, and it's nine months closer to supplies, spare parts and emergency services.

If you can't keep Camp Mt. Everest going, then you definitely won't have a snowball's chance on Mars.


Don't forget how the lack of magnetic field and low gravity means even if by some scifi feat of giga-engineering you create an atmospheric on Mars, it'll boil off into space (like the previous one did). Mars loses approximately a few kilotons a year, while Earth loses approx 3kg/yr.

I'm a fan of Antarctica myself, for similar reasons. Also a much bigger space that fewer people (though, not "nobody") will get offended about colonizing.

Personally, I think that if they were serious about this, it is something they should be doing right now. I don't see a reason not to do it. It is simply insane from an engineering perspective to think you can just "design" an entire off-world colony without working your way up. The knowledge you would gain is incredibly cheap compared to its value. But it's not happening, which leads me to believe, they're not serious.

Heck, even just a "colony" in some California mountains would be a good start. You shouldn't even try to work up to full Biodome in one shot, especially given how those were generally "meh" at best. Much faster iteration cycles if you're close to infrastructure. Do something so you're not betting multiple expensive lives on "we can design an off-planet colony correctly on a computer in one shot".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: