Hacker News Clone new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit | github repologin
OpenAI hits pause on video model Sora after artists leak access in protest (www.washingtonpost.com)
58 points by marban 2 hours ago | hide | past | web | 20 comments | favorite





This is so weird. They are mad that they didn't get paid for voluntarily participating in a program that never offered any pay? There are legitimate artist complaints around AI (I don't always agree with them, but they are reasonable complaints to have and are part of very important conversations about how society chooses to interact with AI), but this has got to be the silliest one I have heard so far.

> This is so weird. They are mad that they didn't get paid for voluntarily participating in a program that never offered any pay?

Companies have been getting ever bolder about abusing volunteer and crowd sourced labor. When the participants are bound by strict NDAs, I think some skepticism is in order.

All we really can tell is that non-neglibigle percentage of the participants in a limited access program were creeped out enough to be willing to blow up their access to call attention to it.

I don't think this story is really even about AI at all, but about labor practices.


Probably blown away by what was possible so they panicked.

Maybe they agreed first and later realized that if they help ClosedAI murder their future careers and careers of other artists they might as well get paid for it.

“Hundreds of artists provide unpaid labor through bug testing, feedback and experimental work for the program for a $150B valued company”

This is a hilarious basis for protest


Unless they volunteered precisely so that they would have early access and could leak it, which would be sensible.

So stupid. I realize artists are panicking but this angle just makes them look like Luddite villains.

I highly recommend reading about luddites! This Smithsonian article covers the topic well: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-the-luddites-rea...

Basically luddites were never the bad ones, they were protestors against abusive working conditions. They did sabotage the owners of the mills that paid them so poorly, sometimes by destroying machinery, but it was really an underground labor movement that’s super cool to learn about.


No, there was nothing "super cool" about the Luddites. Stop trying to rehabilitate these thugs. Failing that, do it someplace other than a site called "Hacker News."

[delayed]

> > unpaid labor through bug testing, feedback and experimental work for the program for a $150B valued company”

> This is a hilarious basis for protest

Of course. Every CEO works for free these days. /s


Looking at the examples here: https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/1861450051085545880

It seems pretty underwhelming compared to what was shown in early 2024 no?


There's a bunch of commercial options live right now that have comparable results. Not sure what all the hype is about, here are a few:

https://runwayml.com/

https://klingai.com/

https://hailuoai.video/

https://lumalabs.ai/

https://pika.art/

https://viggle.ai/


> It seems pretty underwhelming compared to what was shown in early 2024 no?

People seem to have five fingers so I would say that as a win.


Yeah, for all the talk of Sora building an internal “world model” that could be a building block for AGI… this seems to suffer from all the same glitches as the Will Smith spaghetti video, just with much, much more polish.

I don’t think it’s that much worse than what OpenAI showed off earlier in the year when you consider that those examples were very cherry-picked, though. These new videos don’t make it seem like a bad model, they’re just a bit more realistically mediocre.


Apparently they only had access to the light/turbo model, not the full one.

Source for this claim? I've never heard it before.

Wow yeah. The pixelation makes it hard but chopstick pens, pages moving, cars crossing over eachother.

Demo's gonna demo.


I’d love to see the contract those artists signed! I’m sure they did, or should have, gone in with their eyes wide open, and not sure what they expected from OpenAI (since clearly there wouldn’t have been any mention of payment in the contract), or whether OpenAI started asking them for a lot of work maybe (that’s the only thing I can think of that would give them the right to complain)?


I wish the slop era would just get up to speed already so it can be seen for what it is.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: