That's a really interesting application of LLMs and manim.
My problem with it, as with LLMs in general, is that i can't fully trust it. This isn't a problem with topics you know well.
But those 3b1b style tutorials are meant to build an understanding or mental model of a concept for people who don't know it well yet.
I'm afraid that, if the output is (partially) wrong, watching such a video could be even harmful in understanding the concept, because your 'greenfield' brain may pick up pieces of it that made sense to it.
FYI for the input "Graph a cartoid and explain it" I get a correct definition and some interesting facts/properties (in spite of the fact that I mis-remembered the name of the object I had in mind; it should have been "cardioid"). But then it tries to provide a plot, and the plot has an error:
```
Error
Please check your input:
Undefined variable
heta
```
Looks like there's a "theta" that's being incorrectly truncated, or something to that effect.
I refreshed a few times and found that I consistently saw this same error.
I was able to replicate your error and pushed a fix, it should be working pretty reliably now for equations that include theta. Let me know if it works for you!
It's pretty good! It did quite well when asked a variant of "when do the trains meet" problem, although it used different values for speed than what I told it to use (and what it actually used in textual response: 120km/h and 20km/h in video vs 80km/h and 60km/h in the prompt and textual response).
I am so happy tools like these gets created and is available for free.
When growing up, I had difficulty learning math and I wasn't able to ask my parents for help so much. That is when I found PhotoMath, it changed my life, it became my second teacher and it was for free! I don't think Google even owned it at the time.
I remember being very scared of losing it one day. Luckily that never happened, but I will never forget how much these math tools helped me growing up.
As a test, I input a2b2. It interpretted that as a^2xb^2 which is fine but it kept pronouncing "A squared" as "a square" (more phonetically, "uh square")
For a tool meant to enlighten, hearing "a square be square" was confusing.
Neat, but I think I'd like it better if you simplified it and dropped the focus on teaching students. What I'd prefer is a slightly smarter WolframAlpha that doesn't force me to learn their weird syntax. Let me ask my math question in English, you turn that into a formula and just give me the solution. I don't need the explanation.
The video generation is overly ambitious. Some of them come out wonky and wrong.
Thanks for the feedback. We can improve the model's focus on the task at hand and/or ask for more details if doesn't have enough context. With a bit more clarification, MathGPT outputs your answer: https://math-gpt.org/?problem_text=solve%20x%20mod%2066%20%3....
Very neat! Can created content be reused freely by teachers? Do you require attribution? I am interested in tikz plots more than in videos, personally.
Holy cow this is insanely wonderful. Extremely beautiful explanation of concepts. The generated videos are like professionally hard-crafted. Great work!
I tried it on a simple problem and generated the video thinking I would get a video that would go through the steps of division. Instead it said "Let's take number XX and divide it by number YY using a calculator to get the result ZZ".
I'm thinking, wait a tick, you're the calculator. Weren't you supposed to show your work? It's that literally the point?
It's a funny utility but I'm not sure it's all that useful.
it says .org in the domain. Is this a "for-profit" privately operated company or some experiment with GPT? did you guys build your own proprietary model or is it using some open source LLM model?
How Jeb! Won the election: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=b9e16dbd-cab6-44e3-a393-f255b...
Mathematical proof AI is doomed: https://math-gpt.org/?video_id=c5745f99-b1d1-4c57-8a93-6fe3b...
reply